providing the highest level of communication services

SimpleExample

In simple example I noticed that you are starting a thread for cstaMulti, and then in your thread, every run operation you set setmonitoring for devices....

Is this necesary, or is it enough to do it like this:

private static CSTAFunctions csta;
csta = new CSTAClient3000(new CSTAMulti(this, _theProps),_theProps);
csta.MonitorStart(10);
csta.MonitorStart(11);
--------------
the reason I am asking is that sometimes I get delivered event, and sometimes nothig happens, but if I rerun the code above the I start geting events again?

The difference from my and your init (in SimpleExample) is that you use CSTA MULTI and I use CSTAFunctions... and that I don't have the run method in my class - so I dont loop for extensions ??

So to sum it up, what is the correct scenario or init of the csta story. I am using Siemens HiPath3000.

with br
KristjanK

‹ Connection to Hipath 4000 & hipath 3000 Hold and retrive problem ActivaTSP ›

Try private static CSTAMulti

Submitted by cstachris on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 18:27.

Try

private static CSTAMulti csta;
//if you do want CSTAFunctions interface, instead try
//private static CSTAFunctions csta

csta = new CSTAMulti(this,_theProps);

Within the CSTAMulti.setImplementation() method, and through the properies, the correct implementation will be initialised.

This way - your code is transportable across Siemens/Ericssson/et al, with only changes in the properties file (well that's how it's supposed to work).

http://client.trac.opencsta.org/browser/trunk/src/org/opencsta/client/CS...

I will use the CSTAMulti. As

Submitted by kristjank on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 19:11.

I will use the CSTAMulti.

As from the conceptual point of view, as in the simple example there is a cstathread that handles all the communication and monitoring. At the moment I am not using a thread, rather than that I just create the objects and use their methods.

your run method keeps calling monitorStart(device)? So as I sometimes dont get all the events, I gues that is the part that I have to implement (thread and in the run method keep calling monitor start) -

do I have to take care of some "keepalive" calls from client to server, or is this basically solved with thread and monitorstart command ?

tnx
with BR and a nice weekend to you to

Hello Chris, the problem with

Submitted by kristjank on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 21:10.

Hello Chris,

the problem with the events was that the class CSTAMulti didnt pass the calls on to the correct implementation class. Thats why answering and holding a call wasnt working when I was using directly the CSTA implementation, now when I was using CSTAMulti nothing hapened. So I added the forwarding calls to the implementation object.

public void AnswerCall(String device, String call_id) {
log.info(this.getClass().getName() + " CALL CONTROL ANSWER CALL: "
+ call_id + " @ " + device);
-->> implementation.AnswerCall(device, call_id); //THIS LINE WAS MISSING
}

I added the forwarding calls in AnswerCall, HoldCall, RetrieveCall, Deflect, SetDisplay and TransferCall.
I am not sure if I can commit to your svn, havent tried it yet... but now it works....

with br
Kristjan

Ahhh.. I still have some code

Submitted by cstachris on Thu, 09/08/2011 - 19:16.

Ahhh.. I still have some code missing.

I did a recovery from a back up months ago and lost some changes :(
Nothing major, but this sort of stuff.

I'll go through and make those changes, thanks for finding them..

C

Updated

Submitted by cstachris on Fri, 10/07/2011 - 20:12.

Hi Kristjan - sorry for taking my time and thanks for coming across this. I have now committed those changes.
Thanks for pointing it out once again!
Cheers

Thnx a lot ant not a problem

Submitted by kristjank on Fri, 10/07/2011 - 20:33.

Thnx a lot ant not a problem for late reply :)

there are some small fixes also needed in ConnectionClearedEvent - I changed it on my side already

get_droppedConnection, get_releasingDevice, get_localConnection and get_Cause - were returning null, instead of object attributes... so i changed to corret return attribute and its ok now...

However I have another question - I will post it in a new thread, since it doesnt belong here...

with BR

Please share

Submitted by mistify on Sat, 10/08/2011 - 02:10.

Hi,

Can you please give me all the files you've changed? I have similar problems, I added implement. but it doesn't work properly.
My address is mistify1987@yahoo.com

Thank you!